Tag Archives: Civil War

South Sudan ‘free at last’


By ALEXANDER DZIADOSZ AND JEREMY CLARKE | REUTERS

Published: Jul 9, 2011 18:00 Updated: Jul 9, 2011 18:16

JUBA: Tens of thousands of South Sudanese danced and cheered as their new country formally declared its independence on Saturday, a hard-won separation from the north that also plunged the fractured region into a new period of uncertainty.

The president of South Sudan, Salva Kiir, stood next to his old civil war foe the president of Sudan, Omar Hassan Al-Bashir, who now leads just the north, at a ceremony to mark the birth of the new nation.

Under-developed, oil-producing South Sudan won its independence in a January referendum — the climax of a 2005 peace deal that ended decades of fighting with the north.

Security forces at first tried to control the streets in the south’s dusty capital Juba, but retreated as jubilant crowds moved in overnight and through the day, waving flags, dancing and chanting “South Sudan o-yei, freedom o-yei.”

Some revellers fainted in the blistering heat as South Sudan’s parliamentary speaker, James Wani Igga, read out the formal declaration of independence.

“We, the democratically elected representatives of the people … hereby declare Southern Sudan to be an independent and sovereign state,” said Igga before Sudan’s flag was lowered, the South Sudan flag was raised and the new anthem sung. Kiir took the oath of office.

People threw their hands in the air, embraced and wept. “We got it. We got it,” one man said as he hugged a woman.

The presence of Bashir, who campaigned to keep Africa’s largest state united, was a key gesture of goodwill.

It will also be an embarrassment to some Western diplomats at the event. The International Criminal Court has issued an arrest warrant for Bashir on charges of war crimes in Darfur.

Bashir gave a speech congratulating the new country. “The will of the people of the south has to be respected,” he said, ading that both states had to maintain peace.

North Sudan’s government was the first to recognize South Sudan on Friday, hours before the split took place, a move that smoothed the way to the division.

The United States, China and Britain signalled their recognition of the state on Saturday, according to official statements and government media reports.

“After so much struggle by the people of South Sudan, the United States of America welcomes the birth of a new nation,” said US President Barack Obama, stopping short of announcing any immediate changes in longstanding US sanctions on Sudan that Khartoum has been hoping will be lifted.

Dignitaries including UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon and the leaders of about 30 African nations attended.

In a possible sign of the South’s new allegiances, the crowd included about 200 supporters of Darfur rebel leader Abdel Wahed Al-Nur, fighting Khartoum in an eight-year insurgency just over South Sudan’s border in the north.

Earlier, the supporters of Nur’s rebel Sudan Liberation Army faction stood in a line chanting “Welcome, welcome new state,” wearing T-shirts bearing their leader’s image. One carried a banner reading “El Bashir is wanted dead or alive.”

Traditional dance groups drummed and waved shields and staffs in a carnival atmosphere.

The crowd cheered as Kiir unveiled a giant statue of civil war hero John Garang, who signed the peace deal with the north.

Kiir offered an amnesty to armed groups fighting his government and promised to bring peace to troubled border areas.

“I would like to take this opportunity to declare amnesty for all those who have taken up arms against Sudan,” he said.

“I want to assure the people of Abyei, Darfur, Blue Nile and South Kordofan that we have not forgotten you. When you cry, we cry. When you bleed, we bleed. I pledge to you today that we will find a just peace for all,” he said, adding that he would work with Bashir to achieve those goals.

“Today we raise the flag of South Sudan to join the nations of the world. A day of victory and celebration,” Pagan Amum, the secretary general of the South’s ruling Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM), told Reuters.

Seeds of future tension

Khartoum’s recognition of the South did not dispel fears of future tensions.

Northern and southern leaders have still not agreed on a list of issues, most importantly the line of the border, the ownership of the disputed Abyei region and how they will handle oil revenues, the lifeblood of both economies.

At the stroke of midnight the Republic of Sudan lost almost a third of its territory and about three quarters of its oil reserves, which are sited in the south. It faced the future with insurgencies in its Darfur and Southern Kordofan regions.

Sudan now shrinks to being the third largest state in Africa, with about 1.86 million sq km of territory.

In Khartoum on Saturday, one sign of the new national order was the disappearance of some English-language and SPLM-linked newspapers. The north said it suspended them on Friday as they were published or owned by southerners — an ominous signal for more than 1 million southerners left in the north.

Many northerners see the separation as a loss of face.

Analysts have long feared a return to war if north/south disputes are not resolved.

The United Nations Security Council voted on Friday to establish a force of up to 7,000 peacekeepers for South Sudan.

Mostly Muslim Sudan fought rebels in the south, where most follow Christianity and traditional beliefs, for all but a few years from the 1950s in civil wars fueled by ethnicity, religion, oil and ideology.

Advertisements

Should we care 150 years later?

I can remember the first time I saw the movie Glory*.  I was in a junior high school History class, and I was just as dismayed then to listen to the Civil War and Emancipation discourse as I am today…

It’s a bit unsettling at times, to have discussions about slavery with white people, partly because it’s an emotionally charged page in history, and also because it’s tempting to become defensive if the discussion turns into a blame game.  The bottom line is that we all know slavery was/is wrong, and yet it’s difficult to move past, even today.

But probably what challenges me (to put it nicely) more than having a discussion about slavery with white people, is having a discussion about slavery with black people.  Yes, I said it.  But let me be specific.  There is something about history in schools today that seems to turn most black kids off, and it’s completely understandable.  The content is seemingly irrelevant, often taught in a manner that heroifies our forefathers, demonizes those who have in someway opposed our country, and makes so predictable the discussion of black and brown people in America.  And what’s the consequence?  Apathetic, ignorant, and mentally enslaved youth who have decided that they no longer care.   Having once been that “turned-off” kid, and having taught a middle school Humanities and American History class, I quickly learned how to approach a classroom full of detached pre-teens.  I had to remember my own sentiments, and the moment I learned to actually care about history in order to do any real teaching

I’ll skip my identity story and get to the point.  As we commemorate the 150th anniversary of the Civil War, and we think about all those soldiers in both the Union armies and volunteer companies, as well as Confederates who sacrificed themselves for their beliefs and for the future of the country, it’s extremely crucial to also evaluate the true history and purpose of the war, and if we’ve really moved passed it.  It’s also important to consider why people may seemingly not care before assumptions are made and boxes are drawn for groups of people.

I read an article on the NPR today, and it’s title (The Root: Blacks Should Care About the Civil War) really got me thinking. We should care, and I can guarantee you, we do care.  Even if some of us have not yet realized.  Our youth today have not yet had to face any political or socially defining moment or had to fight for their freedoms in the way that our ancestors or forefathers had to.  Many of them, regardless of race or ethnicity, have not been tested in that way.  We also need to remember, the history books, classes, and teachers who lead them don’t always give the full story, told from multiple perspectives and in a way that maintains the dignity of all engaged in the conversation.  We can’t make anyone care, but if we present the facts, share the conflicts and controversies, and allow people to work through their confusions, disagreements, or pain, the indifference will fade…

*Glory tells the story of the 54th Massachusetts Infantry, the first Northern black volunteer regiment of the Civil War.  For more information, click here.


%d bloggers like this: